|
Speech delivered by Ex-president, Dr. Leonel
Fernández at Seton Hall University.
Monsignor Robert Sheeran, President of Seton
Hall University;
Dr. Mel J. Shay, Provost of Seton Hall;
Dr. Frank J. Morales, Executive Director of Special
Academic Programs;
Distinguished Authorities;
Faculty Members;
Students;
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Some years ago, in the mid eighties, I had the
opportunity of visiting Seton Hall University. At that time, I was
part of a group of Dominican university professors who came to share
their views and experiences with U.S. scholars on a set of important
issues regarding our nations.
As I recall, Seton Hall was then a joyful place,
bursting with eagerness for learning as much as with passion for
basketball.
Later on, when I was lucky enough to catch the
Seton Hall basketball team on T.V., I would always remember my visit
here and say to myself, sometimes biting my nails: “Come on, boys,
let’s beat them.”.
Today, I am honored and privileged to receive
an Honorary Doctoral Degree in Human Letters form a
higher learning institution as prestigious as Seton Hall for what
has been considered as accomplishments of my administration in strengthening
democracy and positioning the Dominican Republic in international
affairs.
I would like to thank all those that have made
this precious moment possible, especially to the members of the
Dominican Institute at Seton Hall, who submitted the petition for
approval to the University’s authorities; to Dr. Frank J. Morales
and Monsignor Robert Sheeran for all their interest and support.
I would also like to thank Dr. Franklyn Holguin
Haché, who embraced this project with enthusiasm and warmth, as
well as to the Rectors of the Dominican Universities: Monsignor
Agripino Nuñez Collado, Rafael Toribio and Mariano Defilló,
who are accompanying us today.
Also, I would like to express my gratitude to
Jacqueline Malagón, for all her efforts, and to all the members
of the Dominican Week team.
Once again, thanks to all of you.
Regarding the situation of the Dominican Republic
in the new international system, there are certain ideas I would
like to share with you today.
First of all, that the whole world has been going
through an accelerated process of transformation in which the expansion
of democracy, trade liberalization and global communications have
played a key role.
We are now living within a new international
context that has substituted the old ideological rivalries between
the superpowers during the Cold War for an interdependent, globalized
world order.
This emerging new world order creates opportunities,
but also poses many risks and uncertainties for all nations, especially
to those living under precarious conditions, such as the Dominican
Republic.
Globalization, with all its technical and scientific
revolution, creates a new interwoven network of nations that interact
closely in the areas of economic production, distribution and consumption
of goods and services, by way of a more intensified international
transfer of capital, technology and people.
With all the profound changes that have taken
place in the last decade, the world has really shrunk, becoming
a borderless global village.
But as a consequence of globalization the gap
between the rich and the poor has widened. Social inequality has
deepened. Wealth is being concentrated ever more in fewer hands.
Millions of people live with less than a dollar a day. Deadly diseases
are spreading everywhere and there seems to be no valid prescription
for alleviating world hunger.
Ambivalence appears as the dominant characteristic
of this period of history in which the greatest fortunes ever accumulated
by mankind coexist with the greatest poverty ever endured.
Without knowing that he would portray a precise
image of the times we are living in, Charles Dickens wrote in his
classic novel, A Tale of Two Cities, these masterful
words:
“It was the best of times, it was the worst of
times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness,
it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it
was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the
spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything
before us, we had nothing before us…”
What does this all mean for the Dominican Republic,
a small Caribbean country who shares with Haiti, the poorest country
of the Western Hemisphere, the island of Hispaniola?
It means an inevitable challenge. A challenge
for survival of its people, of its culture and of its identity;
and a challenge for progress and prosperity.
With the emerging new world order, that operates
more on the basis of trade and investments than on the principles
of traditional geopolitics, the Dominican Republic has embraced
the opportunity to break away from its old insular vision
and international isolationism and become more outward looking.
As I took office in 1996, I found that the Dominican
Republic could not only become more integrated with its regional
neighbors, but also play a leadership role in the area due to its
unquestionable democratic credentials and its economic potential
We signed a free trade agreement with the members
of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) and with the Central American
countries, and proposed a strategic alliance between the two sub-regions
in order to create a market of 60 million people and a unified political
body in all world forums.
To highlight the importance of the Caribbean
and Central America as a whole, I must say that it sustains a trade
volume of 60 billion dollars per year with the United States, which
is larger than the U.S. trade, for example, with France, Germany
or Brazil.
For the Dominican Republic, regional integration
means expanding its export market, and as a consequence, creating
new job opportunities. But it also represents a valuable preliminary
experience in dealing with international markets prior to a wider
integration with more sophisticated markets on a global scale.
The trade liberalization process will continue
in the Western Hemisphere with the Free Trade Area of the Americas
(FTAA) initiative, that was originally launched at the Miami Summit
of 1994 and which envisages an area of free trade for all of Latin
America, the United States and Canada by the year 2005.
The Dominican Republic must prepare itself to
meet this new endeavor with an attitude of openmindedness, acknowledging
that this is an inevitable trend that has been put to work since
the end of World War II, is gaining strength and is heading towards
the full integration of the whole world under the guidance of the
WTO.
However, what the industrialized nations should
take into consideration when dealing with these matters is that
there is a growing gap with the under-developed countries that urgently
needs to be addressed. One way to approach this is, as the European
countries did with the less developed areas of the continent in
the process of creating the European Union, by granting provisional
concessions and increasing the cooperation and investments in these
deprived areas.
I am not suggesting that the industrialized countries
carry the burden of the historical structural inadequacies and deficiencies
of the underdeveloped countries. But I am making the case they should
neither increase their hardships by not taking into consideration
the unequal starting points for a trade relationship between these
two different levels of economic development.
By ignoring this fact the developed countries
would contribute to the destruction of the poorer countries’ production
capacity, entailing the somber consequences of unemployment, social
unrest and political upheaval.
On the other hand, by helping uplift the fragile
conditions of the underdeveloped economies, the industrialized nations
are contributing to create stronger markets, from which they benefit
as it increases their exports.
To many observers of the world scene, the end of the Cold War and
the emergence of a new world order which emphasizes business and
markets over any other consideration, has meant a loss of interest
from the world powers towards Third World nations.
This apparent lack of interest, which is expressed
through a policy of benign neglect, is a result of the fact, according
to this line of reasoning, that there is no threat coming any longer
from a collapsed communist world, and for that reason, holds no
preoccupation or concern of the developed world.
To support this viewpoint, the decrease in aid
programs, the revision of quotas or limitations to unilateral access
to markets are signaled out as some of the most remarkable features
of this neglect or lack of interest towards the poor areas of the
world.
Even though these facts are undisputable, it
should be fair to say that a new agenda, that includes economic,
social, political, environmental, technological and security issues
is bringing the world to a closer tie.
To take advantage of the opportunities the emerging
new world order may bring, a country like the Dominican Republic
must develop a strategic vision, which means making an assessment
of its actual resources and determining where it wants to become
more competitive in the short, medium and long term.
During many years of its history, the Dominican
Republic depended basically on agriculture, and it was a major producer
and exporter of sugar, coffee, tobacco and cocoa.
As the prices of some of these commodities began
to fall on the world markets, the country started to make a shift
during the seventies and eighties towards a more service oriented
economy, basically in the areas of tourism and free trade zones.
Thanks to these new and vigorous economic sectors,
as well as to the ever growing remittances from Dominicans living
abroad and the flourishing of the financial, commerce and telecommunications
sectors, the Dominican Republic has prospered during the last decade
as never before.
But our economic model has depended, fundamentally,
on a labor intensive, low-wage system that will undoubtedly become
obsolete in the upcoming years, due to the fact that world centers
of production are operating more on a model of knowledge-based economy.
For the Dominican Republic, the challenge of
the next decade will be to make a new paradigm shift from the labor
intensive, low wage model that has prevailed during the last two
decades, to a knowledge based economy with highly skilled labor,
connected to the world markets.
This does not mean I disapprove of what has been
done in the past or is being done today. What I am trying to do
is establish a path for the future, more in accordance with world
trends, and consequently, more propitious for growth and prosperity.
The information technology is the backbone of
this new knowledge based economy, and it brings the opportunity,
for the first time in human history, to allow a country, such as
the Dominican Republic, to skip stages of development and leapfrog
into the modern world.
In order to educate the human resources needed
for this new information age, during my administration we introduced
computer labs connected to the internet in public high schools.
We built the Technological Institute of the Americas
with the purpose of training the young labor force that will be
employed in the new high-tech industry and we created the Santo
Domingo Cyberpark, which is intended to attract investments in the
same field.
The Dominican community living in the United
States can play a significant role in the future of all these projects.
During my previous trips to the U.S., I have
met many young Dominican professionals trained in the areas of hardware
and software engineering, business administration, management and
marketing who have expressed a strong desire to apply their knowledge
to what they jokingly labeled “the Santo Domingo Silicon Alley”.
Institutions like Seton Hall and other colleges
and universities in the U.S. have also been making important contributions
to the fulfillment of this project with the educational opportunities
being offered to young Dominicans, as well as through the exchange
programs with Dominican institutions of its kind.
It is my firm belief that only through education,
we as a nation, and I am speaking for those who live in the island
as well as for those who live here, can make the changes needed
to transform the Dominican Republic into a modern society, filled
with hope, opportunity and social justice for all.
In the sphere of U.S.- Dominican Republic
bilateral relations, there is also a new post-Cold War agenda, with
a set of issues that are of mutual interest.
The United States and the Dominican Republic
share the same goals and ideas related to the protection of freedom,
human rights and democracy.
We both believe in a fair political system of
checks and balances, a strong judiciary and freedom of the press.
We deplore and struggle with the same determination
against drug trafficking, money laundering and against all forms
of transnational crime.
We cherish dearly world peace, and we think tolerance
and understanding are the premises under which we can construct
the possibility of living together on this planet.
We know that the Dominican Republic is not a
priority on the U.S. international affairs agenda, and we do not
intend it to be otherwise.
The Dominican Republic is not a military power.
It is not a world class economic power. It does not have the means
or resources to alter world affairs. And it is not in a critical
situation.
The Dominican Republic is only a small country.
But a small country proud of its history, its culture and its identity.
It is a country of highly prestigious intellectual
figures, of novelists, poets, short story writers, of painters and
musicians, and of course, of baseball players.
Some say that our baseball players are our main
exports to the U.S. Maybe so. But it is interesting to observe that
even baseball needs international exchange for its development,
which is another way to say that we are living in the era of globalized
baseball.
No one can live in isolation. Neither can individuals
nor nations. For many years the Dominican Republic lived in relative
isolation from the rest of the world, which made us almost unknown.
Beginning a new century and a new millennium,
the Dominican Republic faces the challenge of reducing poverty,
creating job opportunities and modernizing.
Having led the nation for four years, I know
of its strong dynamism, will and vitality, and therefore, have a
reason to feel optimistic about the outcome of its daily struggles,
tensions and anxieties.
I just hope that when we reach our national goals,
we can say for the Dominican Republic what Bishop James Roosevelt
Bailey, the founder of Seton Hall, wished for this institutions
to be: “a home for the mind, the heart and the spirit.”
Thank you.
|